No. Drawings are independent. The time or day does not affect your odds in any way.
It’s almost a universal dream: waking up tomorrow with a winning ticket and a life‑changing fortune. In every café queue or office break room, someone insists they have finally found out how to predict lottery numbers.
Throughout history, countless schemes and “formulas” have promised to crack the lottery code, but does anything really work? The short answer is: no, not in any reliable way. But let’s explore why, what does improve your odds (even if just a little) versus what is pure fantasy.
In theory, if you knew exactly how the lottery machine worked and what numbers were in it, you might predict an outcome. But real lottery draws are designed to be completely random. There’s no pattern or logic behind the numbers drawn.
And because each draw is independent, the gambler’s fallacy (the belief that past results influence future outcomes) is simply wrong. Watching a coin come up heads five times in a row does not make tails more likely. The probability remains 50% on the next flip. The same logic applies to lottery numbers.
This hasn’t stopped a thriving cottage industry of prediction scams. Fraudsters often sell software that promises to “predict tomorrow’s winning numbers,” or send unsolicited messages claiming you’ve won a jackpot but must pay a fee to get it.
So far, no one has ever proven a method that consistently predicts lottery numbers. Some people get lucky, but that’s just it – luck, not prediction.
Lotteries are designed for fairness and unpredictability. In a classic draw, numbered balls are tumbled in a machine and drawn at random, or a computer uses a certified Random Number Generator.
Most lotteries work like this:
One aspect that surprises many is just how steep the odds are, especially for big jackpot games. The odds of winning are extremely low.
| Combination (6/49) | Approx. odds |
| Match all 6 numbers | ≈1 in 13.98 million |
| Match 5 numbers | ≈1 in 55k |
| Match 4 numbers | ≈1 in 1,032 |
| Match 3 numbers | ≈1 in 57 |
| Match 2 numbers | ≈1 in 8 |
That means if you played once a week for 269,000 years, you’d maybe win once. Just seeing these numbers drives home the point: hitting a jackpot is astronomically unlikely.
Mathematics tells us not only how unlikely jackpots are but why prediction strategies fail. A key concept is independent events: two events are independent if knowing one outcome doesn’t affect the probability of the other.
Let’s apply this concept to lotteries now.
So when you hear someone say “these numbers are due,” that’s a misunderstanding of how probability works. Each draw is independent from the last.
Many people have tried using algorithms, AI, and computer models to find patterns in lottery numbers, forgetting that lottery draws are designed to avoid patterns. Plus, modern machines use random number generators or mechanical ball draws, both meant to make prediction impossible.
Some software programs claim to increase your chances, but none have been proven to work. Usually, they’re just showing historical stats or using gimmicks.
In short: no algorithm can outsmart true randomness.
Humans are pattern‑seeking creatures, and lottery analytics systems go around scanning past draws to look for trends. Websites publish lists of most and least frequent numbers, often suggesting you should avoid numbers that have just appeared or choose ones that are “due.”
As each draw is independent, this data has no value. It can, however, help you avoid popular combinations: picking common numbers or using birthdays may lead to sharing your prize with many others.
Artificial intelligence promises to revolutionise many industries, but it cannot see into a truly random future.
In a 2025 interview, LotteryUSA investigated companies claiming to use AI to predict lottery numbers mathematically. A researcher ran various AI models on historical data from the German lottery. Each model produced a different set of numbers and none won.
A lottery wheel allows you to select a set of numbers and play every possible combination of those numbers across multiple tickets. Wheeling makes sure you’ll match a subset of your numbers if they appear, potentially producing multiple small prizes.
That said, it does not improve the odds of hitting the jackpot beyond what you’d get by buying the same number of random tickets. Wheeling only increases your coverage.
Guarantees like “at least one winning ticket” only apply to lower‑tier prizes and require purchasing many tickets. The only way wheeling increases your chance of matching more numbers is by purchasing more combinations. And that comes at a cost.
Although prediction is impossible, there have been very rare instances where players exploited structural weaknesses rather than randomness.
Stefan Mandel’s brute‑force schemeIn the 1980s, Romanian‑Australian economist Stefan Mandel calculated the total number of combinations for certain lotteries, raised investment capital and printed millions of tickets with every possible combination.
His six‑step formula included calculating all combinations, finding lotteries where the jackpot exceeded the number of possible combinations, raising funds, printing tickets, delivering them to authorised dealers and claiming the prize.
It worked. Mandel won several jackpots, but new laws now prohibit bulk ticket purchases and home printing, making his strategy impossible today.
WinFall roll‑down exploitationIn the mid‑2000s, Michigan’s WinFall and Massachusetts’s Cash WinFall lotteries offered roll‑down jackpots: if nobody hit the jackpot at a certain threshold, the prize money was distributed among lower‑tier winners.
Mathematician Jerry Selbee noticed that during roll‑downs the expected return exceeded the ticket price, so he and his wife Marge bought hundreds of thousands of tickets and later formed an investment group.
After media investigations revealed these schemes, the game was discontinued.
Eddie Tipton, an information‑security manager for the Multi‑State Lottery Association, inserted malicious code into random‑number generators and attempted to redeem a $16.5 million ticket through intermediaries. He was eventually caught and sentenced to 25 years.
There are some common strategies people use when choosing lottery numbers. None of these change your actual odds, but some can help you avoid sharing the prize if you win. For example, lots of people pick birthdays (1–31), so choosing numbers above 31 might reduce the chance of splitting the jackpot.
Hot numbers are those that appear frequently, while cold numbers haven’t come up recently. But as we mentioned, every draw is independent and past outcomes don’t influence future draws.
As explained earlier, wheeling systems involve selecting a group of numbers and playing every possible subset. They can generate multiple lower‑tier wins if your chosen numbers appear, but they do not alter the odds of hitting the jackpot and require buying many tickets. Use them only for entertainment, not as an investment.
Pooling resources with friends or colleagues allows you to buy more tickets without spending more individually. Early players did this by splitting the cost of a single ticket and sharing any winnings.
Modern lottery syndicates operate on the same principle: “share the cost, share the winnings.” Buying more tickets increases the probability of winning something, but your share of the prize shrinks because it’s divided among members. Written agreements are basically mandatory to avoid disputes.
The most important “strategy” for anything gambling is, and will always be, responsible play. Lottery is a game, not a way to make money. The Multi‑State Lottery Association advises players to never spend more than you can afford and warns against paying fees or sharing personal details for supposed winnings.
The Florida Lottery’s responsible play guidelines mirror this advice: don’t think of the lottery as income, set a limit using discretionary income, never chase your losses or borrow to play, and avoid playing when you’re upset or depressed. And if gambling stops being fun, seek help from problem‑gambling services.
Read next
No. Drawings are independent. The time or day does not affect your odds in any way.
Yes, in a strictly mathematical sense. Buying more unique tickets increases the probability that one of them matches the winning combination. But when it comes to the expected value per ticket, that remains negative, so spending more doesn’t make the game profitable.
No program can predict a random draw. The only successful “hacks” exploited structural quirks, such as Stefan Mandel buying every combination or MIT students capitalising on roll‑down weeks where the expected payoff exceeded the ticket price. These opportunities no longer exist.
It doesn’t really matter. The probability of any particular combination is the same in each draw. Sticking with the same numbers or switching them doesn’t influence your chances. Some people stick with the same set to avoid the regret of missing “their” numbers on a week they didn’t play.
Yes, smaller regional lotteries or scratch‑off games often have better odds but much smaller jackpots. Always check the odds before playing.
We inform you that this website uses cookies. To consent, click the ‘Agree’ button or continue browsing. To learn more about our privacy policy, click here.
